1100 Hrs
GMT
Sunday
26 September 2010-09-26
Editor © Muhammad Haque
AADHIKARonline flash back on some of our reports in 2006 which remind accurately on Sunday 26 September 2010 of the persistence in the role as touts for Big Biz capitalism.... Crossrail was the touted for scam associated with ken Livingstone in 2006. It is still today. Later on, we shall look an even longer look at Ken Livingstone and his role. The image of Livingstone s the 'red' Ken was always a fakery. He was, if anything, a very determined promoter of Ken Livingstone's career and image. In that pursuit he would change from any position if that change was what did his career the necessary good. As we are beginning to notice today. When Livingstone failed to appear in person to endorse a then alleged candidate of the allegedly democratic coterie in the name of the former Labour Party. The occasion has been reported elsewhere on the day by AADHIKARonline. we here refer to 14 September 2010 which AASDHIKAR reported. It was an event at the Troxy venue in the Commercial Road London E1. Livingstone stayed away along with Jim Fitzpatrick and Keith Vaz. He 'endorsed' Lutfur Rahman as the 'Labour Party candidate/' in an alleged mayoral election that is allegedly taking place in Tower Hamlets. As the days went on, Livingstone behaved in accordance with our diagnosis of the events of 14 September 2010 we published on 14 Sweeter 2010. Twelve days later, Ken Livingstone is being located as far from Lutfur Rahman in public as ordinary gullibility of the brainwashed [in the sense of being lied to, misled, hoodwinked] 'local voters' in the inner city East London borough of Tower Hamlets will perceptively permit..... We shall explore further the antics of Ken Livingstone. We shall look at the role Abbas Uddin 'Helal' played in endorsing Ken Livingstone's promotion of the Big Biz agenda scam CrossRail....That was in 2004. Just after the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail attacks was launched on 31 January 2004...
[To be continued]
AADHIKAR ACTION ARCHIVES:
Editor in Chief © Muhammad Haque
The 2nd Edition published from
London at 0930 Hrs
GMT / 1030 Hrs UK time on
Thursday 27 July 2006
AADHIKAR means RIGHTS. To view history of the introduction of the word AADHIKAR into the English language CLICK HERE
AADHIKARonline
The GUARDIAN backs the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the
Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area; is silent on the Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail.
The Guardian suppresses real truth of devastation on the community being brought by CrossRail hole and yet the Guardian is inciting ethnicity-linked disaffection against the community by creating a new set of phantoms allegedly calling for Bradford-like ‘book burning’ stunts.
The East London Idiotiser ‘report’ on George Galloway’s ‘victory’ talk at Tower Hamlets Council building fails to mention any ‘RESPECT' group political action in reflecting the Khoodeelaar! Campaign for a NO to Crossrail Motion at the Council! – is that how the East London Idiotiser ‘campaign for a better
East End’ ? To know why the East London Idiotiser is as idiotically ‘edited’ today as it ever was, visit this site at 1800 Hrs
GMT on
Thursday 27 July 2006
Who is betraying who and what on the ‘new’ Tower Hamlets Council ? – a report here shortly
Khoodeelaar! legal action – update on the claims against Crossrail hole Bill Minister and against
London mayor Ken Livingstone -
From the previous editions as published on
Wednesday 26 July 2006
London Wednesday 26 July 2006
The crass ‘announcement’ of crassly made ‘interim decisions’ by the ‘crassly made up select committee FOR Crossrail hole’, stating on Tuesday 25 July 2006 that it was ‘needless’ to say that they ‘thought’ the CrossRail hole should be dug in the Hanbury Street, London E1, means that our campaign against the Crossrail hole assault is left with no option but to be raised a few levels higher than we would have had to had there been any evidence of either sense or intelligence on the part of the poodles that make up the parasitic select committee. As we told them in May 2006 when they made a ‘going through the motion' site visit’ of the area, we have no option but to defend the East End against the CRASSrail hole plot, no matter what apparently legitimate shape or face that attacks is hidden behind. We give notice to Tower Hamlets Council’s criminally colluding corrupt clique that ahs done the single most damaging betrayal against the
East End by colluding for the Crossrail hole assault that it shall not find it at all easy going from now on. If it had thought [!] that the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the corrupt role by the criminal elements in effect holding control on Tower Hamlets Council was going to go slow, they could not have made a more stupid miscalculation. We are going to see just what these crooks are made of when they bray against the
East End while at the same time claiming to represent the people of the
East End. Khoodeelaar! Legal action against
London mayor Ken Livingstone – as part of the claims made against ken Livingstone on
5 April 2006 –when Khoodeelaar! Also gave Livingstone an ultimatum stating that he would be taken to court on his crass promotion of the CRASSrail hole plot against the East End of London, Khoodeelaar! has today updated the claims in light of the subsequent evidence showing the continuing crassness by the holder of office of
London mayor in lying against the people and for the facilitation of the peoples’ environment livelihoods and futures by Big Business. The itemised claims against Livingstone will be published here in the next 72 hours.
Of all the claims already published against ‘Tower Hamlets Council chief executive’ Christine Gilbert over her Crossrail hole-inviting role, the most far reaching one is the fact that she covered up for the liars on that Council who lied through their teeth on every single occasion and that she did that in active knowledge that she was breaking the awl, letting disown the community and leaving the East End exposed to devastating attacks that our community did not deserve or need. These claims are now reinforced in the updated communications issued to her this week as the date nears for the application to be field in court.
The Khoodeelaar! legal action programme against Crossrail attacks also includes a number of ethnicity-linked operatives – we have published their names and their identities in the past. A full list of those will be published here as we approach the filing of the specific claims against them in court.
Khoodeelaar! latest on legal action against Crossrail hole Bill Minister – Following a very detailed series of communications with the Department for Transport held over the past two weeks, the Khoodeelaar! legal action programme is now due to submit an updated set of claims against the Minister and this will be done in the next 72 hours. This is being done in accordance with the procedures laid down fro legal action and is in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules. The claims as updated and submitted will be published on the Khoodeelaar web sites in due course. This Khoodeelaar! Campaign news was broken at 1430 Hrs
GMT Wednesday 26 July 2006
Brick Lane! Germaine Greer echoes parts of the CBRUK-backed campaign against Monica Ali ‘book’ film’ – a report here shortly
Aadhikar arts for life – forthcoming feature
Pathetic ploys on TOWER HAMLETS corrupt COUNCIL - why the LIB DEMS 'group leader' should not boast about being given token mayor stint!
How TOWER HAMLETS corrupt COUNCIL is continuing to cause poverty, destitution and deprivation in THE EAST END OF LONDON
View HERE the KHOODEELAAR! No to CROSSRAIL hole Bill – continuing the response to the ‘interim decisions’ as ‘announced’ on Tuesday 25 July 2006 by the poodles making up the uk house of commons ‘select committee’ on ‘Crossrail hole Bill’ [UK House of Commons] The Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill - Latest – We publish here a selection of titles to the Khoodeelaar! Advance analysis that had been written and published months ago, correctly anticipating and almost pinpointing what the poodles committee of 'MPs' for Crossrail would be doing, what antics for CRASSrail they would be performing. As they have done, going by the announcement made on Tuesday 25 July 2006 backing the remaining Crossrail hole plot in the Hanbury Street in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area.
To view a sample list of 89 KHOODEELAAR! files containing the key contents of MUHAMMAD Haque’s legal arguments and constitutional law analyses and political insights against the Crossrail hole Bill and the Crossrail hole Minister and MPs, CLICK HERE Khoodeelaar! had analysed the role of the poodles well ahead of yesterday’s [
Tuesday 25 July 2006] confirmation. The Khoodeelaar! analysis had correctly predicted the role that would be played by that collection of poodles as well as those played by the other lines and batches and arrays of poodles. Khoodeelaar! accurately stated that they were no more intelligent than the lowest common level of political and parliamentary poodles of the ruling Blair junta that could be found at any level of the joke parliament. The idea of parliamentary sovereignty is anathema to poodles like these. They showed their lack of basic intelligence when they ‘heard’ the evidence by some of the significant opponents of the crass Crossrail hole bill. Without exception, the poodles [regardless of the so-called party political differences in the conduct of whichever one was allegedly in charge of proceedings at any given point at any of the meetings of the show committee]objected to the attempts at presenting any evidence that showed up the corruption, the crassness at the centre of the CRASSrail plot. We shall go over some of the crucial evidence of the poodle behaviour that was witnessed in committee room 5 in the so-called
palace of Westminster during last month [June 2006] – the Khoodeelaar! Exposé of the house of commons CRASSrail select committee continues during today,
Wednesday 26 July 2006.
From the previous editions
Publishing programme during
Tuesday 25 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! The first Response to the ‘announcement of interim decisions’ by the Crossrail hole Bill Select Committee of MPs in the UK House of Commons on Tuesday 25 July 2006 Khoodeelaar! constitutional law challenge UPDATE at 2100 Hrs
GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006 to Crossrail hole Bill Minister – [Transport Department urges Khoodeelaar! for delay in filing court case ] [A report on that to be posted here on Wednesday 26 July 2006]
By Muhammad Haque, 2050 Hrs
GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006Brick Lane London E1
The Court challenge against the Crossrail hole Bill is now going to include in the same application a series of claims against the UK House of Commons Crossrail hole Bill Select Committee. This follows the availability, this evening [
25 July 2006] of the evidence of the crassness with which the ‘Crossrail Bill ‘Select committee has been abused by the promoters of the crass Crossrail plot. As I pointed out way back in January 2006, when even the local MP George Galloway was himself absent from this constituency, and neither the ‘local press’ nor the ‘opposition councillors’ on the then Tower Hamlets Council nor any holder of any other ‘elected office’ in the name of this area was saying anything of substance in the context of the plot by Crossrail against the Eats End of London, the Blair regime’s appointment of the token ‘select committee’ was not at all acceptable as evidence of any sustainable claim that the UK Parliament was acting in a constitutionally sovereign way. legitimate, independent or sovereign way that Dicey had sought to paint it to be prone to be doing at most times >br>Having suffered the further spectacles of the illegitimate behaviour by the Crossrail plot promoters in Committee Room 5 ['Palace of Westminster' !] during June 2006 [which was when I had to do some necessary field work that included my witnessing of some of the typical antics of the illegitimate Crossrail hole plot actors], I can now see just why we have to mount the wider programme of legal challenges via the UK courts against the Crossrail hole plotters than we ourselves had thought would be adequate for the defence of the area against this assault when we first worked out the ways in which we would stop the Crossrail attacks on the community. The contents of the relevant ‘decisions’ as ‘announced’ by the CRASSrail Bill Select committee of MPs today show that far from being interested in hearing what we the community know should be acceptable or would be necessary for our economic, our society, our environment in this ciont4ext, the select committee of MPs has been exposed as the sham that it was from the word go when Tony Blair had had it set up. In the next part of this response to today’s 'Select Committee ‘announcement’ I go into each segment and item of the ‘decisions’ as those affect the future of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area. I shall then focus on the NEWER expansion of the City of London takeover of the East End that is being facilitated via the same controlling corrupt clique now ‘representing the present Tower Hamlets doing the imposition of the Crossrail hole attack on this area.[To be continued]
From the previous editions :< /h4>
By Muhammad Haque0540 Hrs
GMT Tuesday 25 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! Court action challenging the abuse of the constitution by the Crossrail hole plotters in the Government and in the CLRL company and in the Crossrail Bill ‘select committee’ bureaucracy – updates here during the day
Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique abuses the local community – again. This time it is staging another typically corrupt, inadequate, misleading INSULTATION at the idiotically named Idea Store at Whitechapel on Thursday [27 July 2006] – detailed commentary here shortly
Further KHOODEELAAR! Legal questions for ‘Chief Executive’ Christine Gilbert to answer as part of the Khoodeelaar! Claims against her in court – updates here during the day
Tuesday 25 July 2006
What crass stunt for Crossrail are we in for during today,
Tuesday 25 July 2006! – Enough of an alert for all visitors to this site and related web sites! Are we all in for another little surprise before the day is out, in the normal plot of things in this context?!!!
VIEW another page from a recent edition of AADHIKARonline by CLICKING HERE
Files posted on this site are deleted or archived regularly. To access older files, please contact us by e-mail with requests for specific date and topic.
From previous editions as published on
24 July 2006
Monday 24 July 2006
Khoodeelaar! The
Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill news, events and legal action updates
How Tower Hamlets Council ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert lied! How her lying antics were exposed by CBRUK and faced with the challenge caused by her initial backing for the lying role for Crossrail hole plot as played by Michael Keith, Christine Gilbert abused her ‘position’ again and prejudicially, illegally, unlawfully ordered employees concerned of Tower Hamlets Council to obstruct Khoodeelaar! campaign and legal action communications about her [Christine Gilbert's] lying behaviour in backing the Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London
Updates on the Khoodeelaar! court action scheduled to be filed this week
How Councillor Abbas Uddin Helal backed the Crossrail whole project. How he lied against the campaigners. How he lied to the local community in the Brick lane and Whitechapel area and said that the Crossrail hole plot was a ‘good’ plot against the local community! How Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ jumped on the liar mayor Ken Livingstone’s Crossrail -hole bandwagon and signed the lying ‘letter’ in the Evening Standard in February 2004
London Monday 24 July 2006 THE AUTHOR/LCAN 200 IN ASSOCIATION WITH KHOODEELAAR! THE BRICK LANE
AND WHIETECHAPEL LONDON E1
AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE
BILL Legal action - final demand to Christine Gilbert and ‘cllr. Abbas’ for answers to questions about CROSSRAIL HOLE attacks role 24 July 2006 You have been asked questions about the incidents of your making false and untrue and untruthful statements about Crossrail plot against the east end of London. Those questions have been put to you at various times in the past 32 months.
Questions that have been put to Christine Gilbert, ‘chief executive’ of the LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL have included these1. The questions as put to you by CBRUK in February 2004, March 2004 and April 2004. 2. Why did you write to CBRUK that you had the minutes that showed that the CBRUK assertion that Michael Keith had misrepresented the position of the community was not accurate? 3. If you had the minutes, were those minutes ‘secret’? if they were ‘secret’ then how could you mention those to CBRUK who had made public statement about the publicly established role for Crossrail hole plot as played by Michael Keith? 4. Where are those minutes? 5. What did you ever understand about the community, let alone about its position on anything? 6. what legal justification is there for your continuing to abuse your employment in the LBTH [London Borough of Tower Hamlets] council to violate the rights of the local community and to make it ever more susceptible to attacks, takeovers by big business and interests that have no intention or likelihood of doing anything whatever that significantly makes any positive, lasting, necessary difference to the quality of life for the vast majority of the people who make up the community on whose behalf and in whose interests the Khoodeelaar! Campaign has existed and campaign against your role for Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London? 7. Where are those minutes? They are not on the Tower Hamlets Council’s web sites and they most certainly have not appeared anywhere in the ‘East End Lies’. So where are they?
Questions to ‘cllr’ Abbas Uddin 'Helal'
1. Why did you sign the ‘letter’ published in the
London evening standard in February 2004 about Crossrail ? That letter was a pack of speculative lies as it made definite assertions about benefits to be brought to the East End of London. Why did you sign it without there being any evidence whatever to justify the pack of Crossrail hole plot lies? 2. why did you stay silent for years despite there being open and repeated questions raised in the community bout tower hamlets council being party to the lying plot for Crossrail hole in the east end? 3. Why have you stayed silent and why have you not answered the questions that have been put to you in writing for the past three years asking you to explain why you said to certain members of the local community that the Crossrail plot was a ‘good’ thing? What evidence has there been to substantiate that false claim? 4. Do you oppose council corruption? Do you know that there is serious concern in the community about council corruption? Do you support the campaign for the rooting out of corruption in tower hamlets council? if your answers to these are in the affirmative then why have you not come forward to sup[port the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the abuse of tower hamlets council funding ‘powers’ and ‘facilities’ to get the local community to ‘accept’ the CROSSRAIL lying hole scheme? 5. Are you in possession of information about Crossrail that you have not shared with the local community? We are asserting that you are in possession of information about Crossrail that you have not shared with the community in the
Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area. We are also asserting that you have not shared the information with the local community because to share the information with the community would have affected your own personal interests. 6. We are saying that you have conspired or plotted or made deals with Christine Gilbert while you held the post of ‘leader’ to frustrate the local community and to deny the community the information to all the deals and contacts that had been taking place and those that had taken place between you and the Crossrail promoters. 7. We are saying that you deliberately and on purpose suppressed the information and deprived the local community of the access to the information about all the relevant contacts and deals and discussions about the Tower Hamlets Council’s role and in the matter of the Crossrail plot against the East End of London. 8. That you abused your position on the Crossrail committee of councillors and that your abuse was similar to the other abuses in that the abuses were intended to allow you to gain or to continue to gain personally and also to deny the local community knowledge of or access to the relevant information about your role, the role of the Tower Hamlets Council and the roles being played by Christine Gilbert and your co-members on the Crossrail committee in making the Crossrail hole plot effective against the local community. 9. That you, ‘cllr Abbas’ took part in the effective collusion against the community for the abuse of the ‘East End Life’ and for the turning of it into the East End Lies on all matters to do with the abuses by councillors of the powers and the facilities of the Council where those related to the duties of the councillors to tell the community how the Council’s behaviour was adversely affecting the interests, the future of the community. 10. That your role on Crossrail has been against the community throughout and that your failure to answer the questions will now have to be investigated by the campaign making the overdue application to court. 11. Do you have anything to say in reply to these latest updated questions? 12. If you have anything to say, you must say so before the end of the day on
Monday 24 July 2006 From the previous editions
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London - Court actions – updates
Arguments against those Five Tower Hamlets Councillors and their ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert – how they let the East End down and how they lied and failed to do their job of defending the East End against the Crossrail hole attacks – latest Khoodeelaar legal action commentary By© Muhammad Haque0950 Hrs
GMT London Sunday 23 July 2006
Five Tower Hamlets Councillors were put on a ‘committee’ that was mentioned in a report in October 2004 as being ‘responsible’ for the Council’s position on the Crossrail plan. Those councillors included Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ or Helal Abbas, then ‘leader’ of the Tower Hamlets Council. Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ is relevant because he is ‘a councillor for the Council ward that included the main target of the Crossrail hole attack on the
Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area’. The other councillors will be discussed later. In this legal update, the key argument against Abbas Uddin Helal in court will include the fact that he failed to represent the facts of the Council’s role on Crossrail to the community. He also failed to represent the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole attacks plan back to the Council. He also failed to tell the community the facts of what the Council was actually doing. In fact, the allegations against Abbas Uddin Helal have been so comprehensive on the matter of the Crossrail hole plot that in our voluntary compliance with the rules of natural justice, we have given Abbas Uddin Helal countless opportunities to put to us his truthful, complete, factual and honest responses to the many questions. He has so far [that is at 0950 hrs
GMT Sunday 23 July 2006] failed to do so. As the court applications against him and against his co-Crossrail hole plan committee councillors are due to start, we have today arranged for one last opportunity to be given to Abbas Uddin Helal to provide the replies to the questions that we have repeatedly and variously put to him. With or without his replies, the court applications against him and his fellow members of the Council’s ‘Crossrail’ “sub committee’’ [of October 2004] will go ahead. Details of the action will be posted here in due course................Khoodeelaar! Court actions update on Christine Gilbert, ‘chief executive’ London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
geovisit();
